there's been an interesting discussion on
the "fairness" of quoteblogs
, which pull whole posts and only "weakly" attribute the source, if
at all. the
original inluminent post
contains several examples of quoteblogs that are causing the
concern, including
scoble's
soon to be continued
quoteblog
.
i had recently become quite a fan of scoble's quoteblog because it
was such a relatively effficient way to find things that i wouldn't
have found any other way, except that it was always irritating that
it was rough to decipher where the original post came from. i had
tended to think of it as a "readibility" issue, since it's clear
that scoble's intent was never to "steal" and it was usually easy
to determine where the post was coming from after doing a little
digging. i'm a bit less comfortable about sites like
stargeek
that don't make it clear at all that they are
swiping content without attribution
. it certainly seems like
stargeek
is playing fast and loose with any reasonable definition of "fair
use".
i've actually dealt with similar issues with the other sections of
the which aren't quite linkblogs, but aren't quite quoteblogs.
years ago when i started, say,
conflux
i had a simple idea of keeping track of all the little quote
snippets that i would collect related to issues that interested me
and see how they would evolve over time.
conflux
is
tomalak's realm
with a broader scope and "contextual threading". in the naive salad
days of yore, i had the vague impression that it probably wouldn't
be o.k. to quote whole articles, that i probably shouldn't link
to "for fee" content unless it was part of a freely available
summary and that i should probably make it obvious where the link
was coming from. i didn't think in terms of the legal definition of
"fair use", but it seemed to be fair to me and i didn't think
anyone would be concerned with the half a dozen readers i might
get.
i think it took a year before i got a mildly threatening letter
from an editor at a publication asking if i knew that my site was
"illegal" and likely to expose me to the whims of the
interpretation of "fair use"? i promptly responded that i'd be
happy to remove all links to their publication and alert readers as
to why i had done so. after a few more emails the editor decided
that i was harmless and let the issue go without getting any
lawyers involved.
but now it's years later and i found myself with a few more than
the original handful of readers and every once in awhile, i wonder
what would happen if i placed ads on the site and started
collecting some pocket change. is it fair for me to make money off
"collecting" other people's content? does it make a difference if
money is involved [ the editor said that it did factor in her
decision to not pursue the issue further ]? is it "fair" to pull
five sentences? how about ten? twenty? does the length of the original article matter?
“"it is hard to be brave," said piglet, sniffing slightly, "when you're only a Very Small Animal." rabbit, who had begun to write very busily, looked up and said: "it is because you are a very small animal that you will be Useful in the adventure before us."”
the complete tales & poems of winnie the poohthis site chronicles the continuing adventures of my son, odin, who was unexpectedly born on the fourth of july at 25 weeks gestation, weighing 1 pound 7 ounces.
he's quite a fighter and you can always send him a postcard to the most current address listed here if you're inspired by his adventures. see the postcard project/google maps mashup to see a map of the postcards.
if you're new, you can browse the archives to catch up. and don't forget to watch a few movies that i made while we were in the neonatal intensive care unit. or if you want the abridged version and you can find a copy, you can read about his adventures in the november 2005 issue of parents magazine.
daddytypes
/
blogging baby
/
rebeldad
/
thingamababy
/
The Continuing Adventures of Super-Preemie
/
dooce
/
look snazzy and support the site at the same time by buying some snowdeal schwag!
valid xhtml 1.0?
This site designed by
Eric C. Snowdeal III
.
© 2000-2005